“…… coup to remove an elected President.”

This would only make sense if Mugabe allowed anyone else into power through the electoral process. The very fact that in 2008 Tsvangirayi won and mugabe denied him the right to rule is enough to make his (Mugabe’s) election in 2013 invalid. I am surprised we are still even debating the long overdue removal of the tyrant as ‘a coup’. How else was he meant to leave power?

By removing that unrepentent mafia thug Mugabe, Zimbabwe avoided a near certain decent into a damaging North Korea style family power dynasty – seeing as both the wife – grace and her kids were very much into politics and Grace made no secret of her craving to rule the country.

One interesting thing is that the MDC now appears rejuvenated following Mugabe’s demise. If he was still around I doubt even Chamisa would have the confidence he enjoys to win power today. There was NO COUP AGANST MUGABE. THERE WAS PEOPLE POWER, – A ZIMBABWEAN SPRING. THATS WHY THOUSANDS THRONGED THE STREETS OF HARARE FOR DAYS UNTIL HE WAS GONE- UNTIL HE SIGNED DE TING!