The Financial Gazette

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Companies & Markets Dollarisation costs RBZ US$360m

Dollarisation costs RBZ US$360m

E-mail Print PDF


Shame Makoshori, Senior Business Reporter

THE Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) could be losing about US$90 million per annum in profits after the country dollarised its economy four years ago, a new research indicated this week.

Dollarisation occurs when a country adopts another country's currency.
In 2009, Zimbabwe moved to a multicurrency monetary regime as part of measures aimed at extinguishing a decade-long economic crisis characterised by runaway inflation, capital and skills flight and a defenceless local unit.
The United States dollar, the South African Rand and the British Pound are some of the major currencies transacting in Zimbabwe since 2009.
Multicurrencies have helped the country restore monetary stability and broadened financial integration, especially with neighbouring South Africa.
There has been intensive debate over dollarisation in Zimbabwe.
Those against the system have demanded the immediate return of the Zimbabwe dollar, arguing that its reintroduction will solve an ongoing liquidity crunch in industries.
However, economists at the Labour & Economic Development Research Institute Zimbabwe (LEDRIZ) have said the RBZ has been losing the equivalence of about 1,5 percent of the country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in note printing and coin minting profits through dollarisation.
"There is a loss of seigniorage in the dollarised nation," LEDRIZ said in the report entitled ‘Beyond the Enclave'.
"Seigniorage is the profit that accrues to the central bank from printing notes and minting coins. The profit normally amounts to about one to 1,5 percent of GDP," said LEDRIZ.
The country's GDP is currently estimated at US$6 million and 1,5 percent of GDP translates to about US$90 million per annum.
Cumulatively, the central bank could lose about US$360 million by the end of 2012, using LEDRIZ's computations. Zimbabwe's central bank is undercapitalised.
Its lender of last resort function has been affected by limited financial resources.
Two week ago, the central bank said it had sealed a US$8 million financial deal with pan African financial institution, African Export and Import Bank, as part of measures to restore its capacity to play the lender of last resort role.
LEDRIZ said dollarisation exposed the economy to external shocks.
"There is a loss of an independent monetary and exchange rate policy, as the central bank's ability to control its money supply, interest rates and exchange rates to influence the domestic economy is undermined," said the report.
"This leaves the dollarised economy vulnerable to external shock," LEDRIZ added.
Last year, the central bank said the country should consider adopting a gold-backed Zimbabwe dollar warning that the US greenback's days as the world's reserve currency were coming to an end.
"There is a need for us to begin thinking seriously and urgently about introducing a gold-backed Zimbabwe currency which will not only be stable but internationally acceptable," central bank Governor, Gideon Gono said.
"We need to re-think our gold-mining strategy, our gold-liberalisation and marketing strategies as a country. The world needs to and will most certainly move to a gold standard and Zimbabwe must lead the way. The events of the 2008 global financial crisis demand a new approach to self reliance and a stable mineral-backed currency and to me, gold has proven over the years that it is a stable and most desired precious metal. Zimbabwe is sitting on trillions worth of gold-reserves and it is time we start thinking outside the box, for our survival and prosperity," Gono added.
Gono's proposals have enc-ountered stiff resistance from some industries that have argued that an early return of the local currency could trigger a fresh wave of hyperinflation and economic decline.
Other countries that have adopted dollarisation include Argentina, Mexico, Bolivia, Peru, Georgia, Russia, Ukraine, Turkey, Romania, Mozambique and Zambia.

Comments (2)Add Comment
...
written by Socio-Political-Economics 101, February 22, 2012
You are all missing the point that the sanctions slapped by the west to hasten regime change are the major culprit of our economic woes (not NRBZ or the Zim Govt)and as long as they are in place resorting back to the Zim-dollar will be unwise. The National Reserve Bank of Zim never changed its policy since before the ridiculous hyperinflation, and if anything the Kasukuweres have actually intensified their calls for indigenisation of the economy and Banks which is supposed to be anthema to economic development. Your readers have to familiarize themselves with economic sabortage against Zimbabwe before rushing to a*sume the wrong 'causa belli' of our economic woes. People who do not undersatand economic reality are bound to be manipulated by those with their own agendas not improving the welfare of the ordinary Zimbabwean. I am sure Gono knows that $90 million per annum is a small price to pay compared to billions or trillions that will be lost by resorting to our zim currency that will then be attacked by America and its allies.
...
written by The Truth, February 17, 2012
What of the money that was lost by many people, including the vulnerable and poor, and businesses? In addition, lost future income streams for those who were net investors. It's not the RBZ that should cry but people who lost their savings, pensions, livelihood name it, as a result of it's very actions. When I left employment, my pension could buy an upmarket home if I could take the lumpsum, but I could not do that because of so-called pension fund rules; it had to be invested somewhere on my behalf because "I cannot look after my money". (We need fundamental reforms in this area; it's pension funds are benefiting fund managers m*re than the beneficiaries). What happened with the hyperinflation? The pension they were going to keep for which I could use to buy an upmarket home for investment was wiped out; zero; it's no m*re. Future pension payments, zero. RBZ should not cry. We should actually be raising cases against the RBZ for its role in brewing and fuelling the hyperinflation. Dollarisation must have cost the many people affected, and companies far over US$ 360 million.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy