The Financial Gazette

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home National Report Miriam Mhlanga: Innocent girl caught in the crossfire

Miriam Mhlanga: Innocent girl caught in the crossfire

E-mail Print PDF

Discovery of Edison Sithole’s remains raises family’s hopes

Zivisai Chagaka, Staff Reporter


AS the mystery surrounding the abduction and disappearance of one of Zim-babwe’s pioneering nationalist luminaries — Edison Sithole — unravels, the family of his young secretary, Miriam Mhlanga, is now hopeful that the remains of their missing member could finally be found also. In an interview with The Financial Gazette earlier this week, Miriam’s elder sister, Maudie Shumba (nee Mhlanga), said the Mhlanga family had received the news with enthusiasm.
“We had exhausted all efforts to find her; we had actually given up hope of ever finding her. But it’s now good to hear that Sithole’s remains have been found; if that’s the case, then that gives us a glimmer of hope that our dear sister’s remains will also be found,” said Shumba.
Miriam was only 16 years old when she disappeared.
The Mhlanga family believes that Miriam’s disappearance was a “plot” to get rid of the two for reasons which Shumba felt was not at liberty to discuss though she hinted that these did not involve the political power plays of the mid-70s within the nationalist movement.
She narrated how, after the country attained independence, their mother and brother, Samson, even visited the late vice-pPresident Simon Muzenda to seek assistance, but “got no joy”.
The mother passed away in July 2002. She said their father had died in September 1970.
“We travelled the length and breadth of this country in search of her, but to no avail. We even engaged Amnesty International after we got wind that she might have been taken to Robben Island (in South Africa), but we were informed that she was not there,” Shumba said.
Shumba, who is the eldest in the family, said Miriam was the last born in the family of eight – six girls and two boys.
At the time of her death, Miriam was staying in Mbare at 17 Mzengeli Street.
Irked by the abduction and disappearance of his sister, one of the boys — Harry or Netsamoyo, who was born before Miriam — left the country a few months after to join the liberation struggle.
When Harry came back from the war, he retired from the army and was incorporated into the civil service until his death in 1982.
“He joined the struggle because he wanted to do away with the system that had taken his sister away,” said Shumba.
“We don’t know why our sister was taken away . . . She wasn’t involved in political activities, but was only a secretary in Sithole’s legal office,” she queried.
Asked what the family was planning to do, an emotional Shumba said since they had learnt of the new developments in the press, “we are yet to discuss the issue as a (whole) family and consider what we need to do next”.
According to Shumba, the information they so far managed to gather was that Sithole and Miriam were taken away from the Ambassador Hotel in Harare separately.
“Miriam was left waiting in the car while Sithole went into the hotel for a meeting. She was approached by two men who told her to come with them. She protested, but the men said they had been sent by Sithole and she complied.
“One of the men remained behind waiting for Sithole at the entrance while she was driven away in a van to charge office (now Harare Central Police Station). And when Sithole emerged from his office, there was another van waiting outside the hotel.”
Shumba said the man who was waiting outside then accosted Sithole and, again, drove him away to the police station. His vehicle was also driven to the police station. “Given the circumstances, Shumba,” said, “We have always believed that they were taken to different places.”
Meanwhile, the Fallen Heroes Trust — a group composed of mainly war veterans who have dedicated themselves to identifying, exhuming and reburying of fallen freedom fighters — claims that the two were dumped at the same place.

Comments (4)Add Comment
...
written by Musonza, September 09, 2010
When I say Brother Arthur is fictitious I mean his name was fitted into the rumour to give credence to the lie that Edison Sithole was abducted by Rhodesian Police I did not mean to say he didn't exist. Brother Arthur was nowhere near when Edison Sithole was abducted. Miriam was employed as a secretary and as all secretaries do she used to man the office from 8.00 to 5.00pm and her boss, Edison Sithole, would come and go doing his legal work but it's unreasonable that he would take his 16 year old secretary to a Hotel to just sit in his car on a hot October day while he was in a meeting or having some beer. The only place where the two would be together was at the office during office hours which is where the abduction took place and not at the Amba*sador Hotel. Miriam was abducted because she knew too much [the identity of the abductors who came to the office].
The year 1975 was a very eventful year in Rhodesian nationalist politics - Dec 1974 nationalist leaders were released from detention - March 1975 Chitepo a*sa*sinated; March 1975 Mugabe crossed border to go to Mozambique; June Mozambique gains independence from Portugal; August 1975 Nkomo/Smith meeting at Victoria falls - October 1975 Edison Sithole abducted - Dec 1975 Nkomo/Smith meeting once again.
Kaunda said the people in Zanu based in Lusaka didn't want the death of Chitepo investigated - only they know why they didn't want his death thoroughly investigated. There were fierce tribal power struggles within Zanu especially in 1975 between the Manyika and Karanga when Zanu members in Lusaka like John Mataure, Raphael Chinyanganya aka Thomas Nhari, Madekurozva and others were executed by Zanu. All this came out in the Chitepo Commission in 1975.
My theory is spot on that Edison Sithole who incidentally was a Manyika/Shangana was taken out by Zanu. Edison Sithole was a member of Zanu from 1963, never really left Zanu but since Zanu had been banned the only vehicle for black nationalism was the new ANC led by Muzorewa and Edison Sithole joined the ANC a party which was intensely disliked by externally-based Zanu. Zanu members, just like the Mafioso, are sworn to secrecy so the truth might never come out. It's very easy to use Rhodesians as scapegoats when the real culprits are Zanu. Had Justin Nyoka not surfaced in Mozambique after he was reported abducted then all fingers would have pointed at the Rhodesians. Let this Jimmy Motsi guy come up with the remains then he will have a lot of explaining to do.
...
written by tino, September 09, 2010
I agree with your a**lysis only one point of correction Brother Authur is not fictitious he actually lived and was based at Kutama College unfortunately he is late now -May he rest in peace
...
written by Saxton, September 09, 2010
The truth of the matter will never be uncovered considering that many years have pa*sed. A lot of conspiracy is being paddled and it becomes difficulty to know what rfeally happens.

I know this will not go down well with many readers but I can only advise the Mhlanga family to accept what happened and go on with their lives.

Almost every Zimbabwean lost a family member during the liberation struggle but the big thing is that we have got our contry back and we are now facing new challenges.

There is nothing good about the past and pepole should just learn to let go.

Tatenda
...
written by Musonza, September 06, 2010
The Financial Gazette is guilty of giving people false hopes on the discovery of the remains of Edison Sithole and his secretary. The Mhlanga family lost a loved one and are in a vulnerable position where they will believe anything with the forlorn hope that they will find their relative. It makes the situation the m*re traumatic for someone to give them false hope. Reporter, Zivisai Chagaka, should be discerning enough to separate plausible scenarios from outrageous accounts.
Edison Sithole was a very well known politician and for Maudie to conclude that his disappearance did not involve the political power plays of the mid-70s within the nationalist movement is way off the mark. How does she come to this conclusion? Miriam was just a 16 year old secretary in Edison Sithole's legal practice not a politician. There's no way Edison Sithole was going to be abducted if he was an ordinary guy for starters, so his disappearance had everything to do with politics without a shadow of doubt. Maudie, Miriam's sister, then goes on to say her brother had 'joined the struggle because he wanted to do away with the system that had taken his sister away' - the brother concluded that her sister was abducted by the Rhodesian police. Maudie Shumba's account about the encounter at the Amba*sador Hotel is all muddled up and implausible. It's as if somebody [whoever the witness is] antic**ated the abduction and was moving with the abductors following every moment of the kidnap episode yet this is something done stealthily. Or it looks like Miriam was kidnapped then released, went home to tell her sister and then was kidnapped again! How does Maudie know that her sister was told to wait in the car? How did she know that her she protested? How did she know her sister was driven to the charge office Harare Central Police Station? There were two vans to take two people separately to the same station? Maudie's account is so muddled up: it doesn't make any sense. This account is different from last week's account which said a fictitious Brother Arthur [of the Catholic Peace and Justice Commission of all people!] saw two Special Branch guys accosting Sithole!
The last paragraph is equally disturbing - that the Fallen Heroes Trust claims that the two were dumped at the same place - how can they be so sure unless they know who did it? Isn't it very obvious that Miriam was abducted because she had seen the people who had argued and taken her boss when they came to their office? That the two were cornered in their office, not at Amba*sador Hotel separately, by their abductors who must have been in a hurry to do the job and get it over with quickly? I vividly remember that since 1975 I have always had doubts about the last sighting of Edison Sithole - he was last seen at the Amba*sador Hotel but the question is was he with the secretary? Why would he take his secretary to the Hotel? This is why I have always maintained that the abduction happened at his office. I knew Edison Sithole from the early 60s in Highfield.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy