The Financial Gazette

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Top Stories Empowerment: Govt targets Old Mutual

Empowerment: Govt targets Old Mutual

E-mail Print PDF

kasukuwere saviourtiff2.jpg

Shame Makoshori and Clemence Manyukwe, Staff Reporters

THE Zimbabwe Stock Exchange (ZSE)-listed Old Mutual, the country’s largest life assurer, is being targeted as the first company to be forced to comply with a controversial empowerment law requiring foreign-owned companies to cede at least 51 percent of their shareholdings to black investors.


The Financial Gazette is reliably informed that there are covet plans by ZANU-PF functionaries to force Old Mutual into an empowerment deal with companies fronted by their cronies.
This is likely to send tremors in the investor community and unleash bears on the ZSE, which has been on a downward trajectory ever since the new empowerment regulations were gazetted into law.
Investors who had shown interest in local assets are already scurrying for the nearest exit points for fear of burning their fingers in what has been promising to be an exciting destination for their investment.
Empowerment movers see the takeover of a controlling interest in Old Mutual as one sure way of cascading blacks’ dominion in every sphere of the country’s economy.
While this will effectively see indigenous investors controlling the nation’s economic levers and overturn foreign influence on the country’s business front, there are barriers along the way.
Funding is obviously one of them, but not the major hurdle.
Old Mutual is largely owned by ordinary men and women who invested their lifetime savings in its life assurance policies and other products.
Pension funds and investments by local companies also constitute a significant portion of the financial behemoth’s portfolio.
Drawing a line between shareholders and policyholders is therefore seen posing headaches to the authorities.
But given the manner in which the controversial land reform programme and Operation Muramba-tsvina were executed in 2000 and 2005 respectively, nothing could be impossible.
Top 10 shareholders in Old Mutual as of February 26 were ranked as Old Mutual Life Assurance Company, Old Mutual (Zimbabwe) Foundation Trust, Old Mutual Diamond Fund, Frittlewell Investments, University of Zimbabwe Pension Fund, Barclays Zimbabwe Nominees, Datvest Nominees, NDH Nominees, Old Mutual Zimbabwe Nominees and Old Mutual Zimbabwe Staff Pension Fund.
Old Mutual, listed on the ZSE, London and JSE securities exchanges, has the largest life assurance operation in the country and owns Zimbabwe’s largest mortgage lender, CABS.
The British headquartered concern has interests varying between five and 15 percent in 85 percent of the companies listed on the local bourse, as well as controlling interests — directly or indirectly — in a range of unlisted investments such as MBCA Bank.
Old Mutual also owns some of the country’s biggest upmarket buildings and shopping malls, among them Westgate, the largest shopping centre with a total of 155 shops and 12 office organisations.
It also owns Borrowdale Brooke, Chitungwiza shopping complex, High Glen shopping centre, Eastgate Shopping Centre and Nkulumane, the largest shopping complex in Bulawayo among other properties.
With a colossal balance sheet dominated by foreign investors, Old Mutual has perennially courted the ire of President Robert Mugabe’s government, which sees it as one of the vestiges of colonialism.
In August 2007, Old Mutual became the first Zimbabwean company to offer 20 percent of its business in Zimbabwe to staff as part of plans to comply with the Indigenisation and Empowerment Act, which was enacted in 2008, but came into full force this month after Indigenisation and Empowerment Minister, Saviour Kasukuwere, published regulations forcing all businesses owned by foreigners to set out, within 45 days, drafts outlining their empowerment plans.
Kasukuwere said foreign controlled companies will have five years from this month to restructure their stakes to remain with 49 percent, triggering fresh alarm among investors, some of whom are reconsidering their future.
There are fears the scepticism will dampen the country’s long-awaited recovery after a decade of political and economic turmoil.
Zimbabwe’s fragile coalition between President Mugabe, Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and Deputy Prime Minister, Arthur Mutambara, has been divided over the empowerment laws while business leaders have warned government to shelve the law, at least for now until the country starts attracting bigger investment inflows.
But President Mugabe has been adamant that the 49 percent will be enough for foreign investors.
“Forty-nine percent is a hell lot of equity, and its only foolish ones who will say so (that the law drives away investors). Wise ones will tell you that it is good,” he told reporters three weeks ago.
Some of the largest foreign controlled companies in Zimbabwe include British-headquartered Standard Chartered Bank, Barclays Bank, Stanbic Bank, BAT, mining concerns Anglo Platinum, Metallon Gold Zimbabwe, RioZim and South African headquartered Impala Platinum’s Zimbabwean operating subsidiary, Zimplats Holdings.
Bankers, along with captains of industry, have previously warned that foreign direct investment could plunge by as much as 30 percent if government pressed ahead with the controversial empowerment law.
Standard Chartered Bank, and Stanbic Bank, in submissions before Parliament two years ago, warned that foreign banks could withdraw from Zimbabwe if they were forced to cede substantial shareholdings to locals.
“We think it is important for Zimbabwe not to implement an empowerment process that is materially different from what other countries have done,” Stanbic said.
“The proposed indigenisation threshold of 51 percent targeted in Zimbabwe would make our country relatively less attractive to foreign investors,” added Stanbic.
Independent economic analyst, John Robertson, said this week Old Mutual could be the first victim of the fresh expropriation spree because of its huge asset base.
He warned that those targeting the firm should not expect to get rich instantly.
“To pick it (Old Mutual) for nothing and believe you get rich is wrong,” said Robertson. “If they pursue this idea (expropriation), there will be no future investment and the impact on future generations will be bad — no jobs and (there will be) social distress.”
Meanwhile, the empowerment regulations are expected to be reviewed by an extraordinary meeting of the Council of Ministers following a crisis meeting held between Prime Minister Tsvangirai and Kasukuwere on Tuesday.
Kasukuwere yesterday declined to disclose discussions with the premier saying they were confidential.
He, however, said the referral of the matter to the Council of Ministers is for “continued improvement” of the quota policy that is in line with the law.
“The regulations are still in force, but we are open to any views. The meeting is for the continued improvement of the regulations,” Kasukuwere said.
The PM’s spokesperson, James Maridadi, also confirmed the imminent Council of Ministers meeting aimed at dealing with the contentious issue.
“It was resolved that an extra-ordinary meeting of the Council of Ministers would be called to specifically deal with that issue,” said Maridadi.
He added that the Prime Minister’s position is that the indigenisation policy must not enrich a chosen few, but “add value to the lives of Zimbabweans and bring change that Zimbabweans demand and deserve”.
The Chamber of Mines, companies and independent economists have said the regulations spell doom for the country’s economy and will result in the flight of investment.
ArcelorMittal South Africa has already said that the regulations are a “significant obstacle” in acquiring the Zimbabwe Iron and Steel Company, which it is eyeing
The regulations state that defiant  investors or locals who act as fronts for foreigners, are liable to imprisonment for five years.
They also provide mechanism for the sub-contracting of procured goods and services, with offenders also being jailed for the same period of time.
When the regulations were published, Prime Minister Tsvangirai said they were null and void as they had been put in place without following due process, but days later, Kasukuwere appeared to be going against him when he told Parliament that they remained in place.
Apart from the jail sentences, the regulations require all existing businesses with assets valued over US$500 000 to declare their shareholding status to the government within 45 days from March 1.
New enterprises would be required to do so within 60 days. Businesses that fail to meet the 51 percent shareholding are required to submit a plan within 45 days from March 1 on how they intend to meet the requirements.
The law says the Indigenisation Minister shall maintain a database of indigenous Zimbabweans seeking to take up the majority shareholding in foreign firms; or businesses wishing to identify any locals to acquire a controlling or lesser interest in the enterprise.
The law says an employee share ownership scheme or trust that complies with the regulations may be taken into consideration when assessing the extent to which it has achieved the indigenisation and empowerment quota.

Comments (11)Add Comment
...
written by Sobantu, March 20, 2010
Malvin I also work in an investment bank in England. Having been told I was a reject in Zimbabwe. People is Zimbabwe should wake up. The time for being stupid is over. We can not have these old man developing ridiculous policies that that affect our future not theirs since they are already one foot in the grave. The economy that they are ruining is our economy not theirs. Who gives them to right to destroy our country and dictate how bad our future should be. what did we ever do to them. Tens are of thousands are starving at home, dying of Aids because of lack of medicines and poor nutrition. tens of thousands of child are not going to school because they can not afford schools fees since the gov stop supporting schools to provide the free education is primary schools and rural schools, tens of thousand of young people are not employed and have no future employment prospects, infact lots of jobs will be lost when companies close down shop after this ridiculous policy takes shape.
The irony of all is that the biggest business sectors when compared with global economies are controlled by the state.
examples
Telecommunications PTC and netone, telecel (Zanu chefs) (econet after nkomo intervention)
Rail transport- NRZ state owned and a faliure
Aviation-Air Zimbabwe state owned (failing)
CSC -beef failed and collapses (state owned)
Zicosteel-Iron ore (failing)
Hw**ge thermal power production (state owned failing at 25% production level)
DDF failed( state owned),
ARDA( was the biggested land owner in the country since 1980 shut down (state owned )which makes the Land reform a joke.
...
written by Malvin, March 17, 2010
As an a**lyst working for an investment bank in london, l can a*sure you no investor will want to invest in Zimbabwe. It pains me a lot to read all these half baked ideas concorted in the name of empowerment of blacks. The reason why developed countries are so developed is they allow the economy to work by itself with very little goverment intervention. If at all the Gvt only intervenes to encourage people to invest.

In addition to develop an economy you need a stable political environment, democracy, a functioning legal system that protects the rights of the citizens, and an educated work force. l will add one thing, you also an economy with proud citizens who work for the development of the country not for personal gain.

i would love to invest in my country but what guarantee do l have that some thug will not declare ownership of my a*sets? none what so ever. Its a total shame words fail me.
...
written by Truth Be Told, March 12, 2010
Given the failure of the land reform this second phase will be equally as drastic. A few questions remain unanswered:

1. What will be the selection criteria?
2. Will there be a tender or bidding process?
3. If so, how will it be regulated?
4. Will there be a mxaimum allocation per person?
5. will there be a concurrent and post audit procedure?
6. Can the MDC majority overrule it in Parliament?

...
written by harare, March 11, 2010
this is yet another doom for zimbabwe. the doom is now recrring after every 10 years and we are a*sured that for the next 10 years we will be crying again.previously the land reform and now the so called empowerment act!!!
...
written by Sobantu, March 11, 2010
Black Light. Zimbabwe has been dying for the past 30years because of this distorted view that you are presenting of so called "supremacist policies and practices" that this government has been claiming to be addressing in the past 10yrs alas 20yr after coming to power. Wake up smelling coffee this is a redundant argument which is useless. What was Zimbabwe like in 1950 socially and economically? how far had it developed by 1980 both economically and socially. Thats the length Mugabe and Zanu have been in power please research and starting informed comments. What have these guys achieved in the the past 30yrs. The time for propaganda is over Zimbabwe needs serious people with series policies to address the serious health needs, employment needs, industrial development, education needs and reforms, human prisons and rehabilitation servies reforms, Care for the elderly and disabled. People are not interested in creating ZANU millionaires but making sure they have shelter, food, can take their kids to school, their children have opportunities for further education and employment.
...
written by Sobantu, March 11, 2010
Its interesting reading the economic ignorance being demonstrated our brothers and sisters in the above comments. Please read the bill in full before commenting on it. This idea that this is a black economic empowerment is laughable to say the least. First things first Kasukuwere says he will maintain a Database of "indigenous Zimbabwean" who will be allowed to acquire the controling shares from those companies hence effectively giving them controlling shares. Don't you people think they is something wrong with this picture. I wonder what crateria will be used to identify these so called indigenous business man fit to control the decision making of these co-operate entities. Should they be party members, card holder etc. Where are they going to get the $billions to acquire these shares or businesses should we a*sume they will have to pay the Market value of business, unless this is another Kangaroo policy in the mold of the so called Land reform which brought the economy to its knees as an empty "busket". My biggest question is what will those so called indigenous businessman going to do with the 51% contolling stake in these companies. Will they improve productivity, employment, growth, research and development, how will all Zimbabweans benefit from these new chefs taking over. I have been going over this question in the past days if Supa, Chiyangwa, and the rest of the AAG guys acquire 51% of Old Mutual or Zimplats how do we as black Zimbabweans benefit from this change over. If they acquire CABS or Barclays how will they improve these financial services institutions and effectively how will we as black zimbabweans benefit. One wonders if these so called Indigenous businessman have financial resources to acquire 51% of the existing companies why have they not started their own companies and provided the much needed employment.
...
written by Kelvin Bhari- Economist, March 10, 2010
Guys, the indigenous bill is a n*ble idea. however, my colleagues and l agree that this is not the most appropriate time to move this notion. Zimbabwe is desperately in need of foreign investment to jump start the economy. This can only be achieved by opening doors for the foreign investor. the same doors are being closed by the same policies we are implementing. remember we have experienced the first US dollar budget deficit. Please guys let's be good timers.
...
written by trust, March 09, 2010
all these laws are set to benefit and enrich a few Zimbabweans, this law is quite a n*ble one but has to be shelved for now. just like it was a good idea to redstribute land, we all noticed that it vastly benefited a few, the likes of Gono with all those multiple farms. we dont just want to change the colour and nationality of property owners. i see this as the next Zanu Pf campaign tool, and we will be worse off soon
...
written by ando, March 08, 2010
...
written by Mfane Khaya, March 08, 2010
"The Financial Gazette is reliably informed that there are covet plans by ZANU-PF functionaries to force Old Mutual into an empowerment deal with companies fronted by their cronies." POOR JOURNALISM. Reliably informed by who. Do not feed us with your polarizing speculation. We want hard facts. We are not convinced overtures have been made to old mutual.
...
written by Black Light, March 08, 2010
We welcome this new development where empowerment of the indigenous person is concern. There is all the reason to redress the imbalances created by supremacist policies and practices. Those who criticise this bill should bear in mind that these major companies benefitted from racist colonial laws that meant to relegate locals to economic spectators. BUT, we are wary of two things in particular: history has demontrated the pathetic track record that the government has in policy implementation and also the fact that these policies tend to benefit only a few Zimbos in a way tht just changes the color of the minority.

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy